AP Exam KitU.S. History

APUSH · 2027

FRQ scoring reference

New exam structure. The scoring rubrics remain unchanged by this reform.

General rubric ≠ a question’s scoring guidelines. Keep original-year questions and 2027 adaptations separately labeled; an adaptation needs its own evidence criteria.

SAQ · Short answer

Three required questions · 9 points total · 20%

3pts each

Secondary texts → primary text → nontext source. Three different historical periods.

A 1B 1C 1
SAQ scoring criteria
CriterionPtsWhat earns credit
A1Meet part A’s specific task with accurate history.
B1Meet part B’s task; explain when asked to explain.
C1Meet part C’s task independently of the other parts.
01Two secondary texts*02One primary text03One nontext source

Question-specific example · Original · SAQ 2

Platform original · structure reviewed

The following is this question’s own scoring rubric. Structural review does not make a platform question an official exam item.

Part A

1 pts
Part A · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1He distinguishes continued commercial relations from permanent political alliances, while allowing temporary cooperation in emergencies.

Examples earning credit

He distinguishes continued commercial relations from permanent political alliances, while allowing temporary cooperation in emergencies.

Common non-credit examples

He proposes stopping all foreign trade.

Part B

1 pts
Part B · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1Wars involving France and Britain divided Americans over obligations and neutrality; choosing a lasting alliance could draw the United States into European rivalries.

Examples earning credit

Wars involving France and Britain divided Americans over obligations and neutrality; choosing a lasting alliance could draw the United States into European rivalries.

Common non-credit examples

The Civil War caused his concern in 1796.

Part C

1 pts
Part C · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1A president’s public recommendation reveals his intended policy, not how widely Americans accepted it. Competing newspapers or petitions would be needed to test public agreement.

Examples earning credit

A president’s public recommendation reveals his intended policy, not how widely Americans accepted it. Competing newspapers or petitions would be needed to test public agreement.

Common non-credit examples

The address proves every American agreed.

Back to guide navigation ↑

DBQ · Document-based essay

Seven documents retained · 25%

7points

Build an argument from the documents and relevant outside evidence. Includes 15 minutes for reading.

Thesis 1Context 1Document evidence 2Outside evidence 1Sourcing 1Complex understanding 1
DBQ scoring criteria
CriterionPtsWhat earns credit
Thesis1A defensible claim answering the task with a line of reasoning.
Context1Connect the task to a broader historical setting.
Document evidence21: describe three documents accurately. 2: use four to support an argument.
Outside evidence1Use specific evidence beyond the documents to support an argument.
Sourcing1Explain why a sourcing feature matters to the argument for two documents.
Complex understanding1Develop a nuanced argument through reasoning or effective use of evidence.

Question-specific example · Original · DBQ 1

Platform original · structure reviewed

The following is this question’s own scoring rubric. Structural review does not make a platform question an official exam item.

Thesis / claim

1 pts
Thesis / claim · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1State a historically defensible thesis that responds to the task and establishes a line of reasoning. Put it in one place, in the introduction or conclusion.

Examples earning credit

Revolutionary ideas expanded challenges to inherited authority, while unequal citizenship and slavery limited their implementation.

Common non-credit examples

Things changed in some ways and stayed the same in others, without specifying how.

Contextualization

1 pts
Contextualization · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1Describe a broader historical context relevant to the task and connect it to the developments discussed. A passing phrase or restatement is insufficient.

Examples earning credit

Imperial taxation and disputes over colonial representation after the Seven Years’ War helped turn arguments about rights into a challenge to British authority.

Common non-credit examples

The Revolution happened before 1800.

Evidence from documents

2 pts
Evidence from documents · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1Accurately describe the content of at least three documents to address the topic. Quoting without demonstrating understanding is insufficient.
2Use at least four documents accurately as evidence supporting an argument in response to the prompt. Description of four documents alone earns at most the first evidence point.

Examples earning credit

Use Adams and Hall to show claims by excluded groups, and the Constitution and Bill of Rights to show selective institutional change. Explain their relationship to the thesis.

Common non-credit examples

Four document titles are listed without explaining their content or role in the argument.

Evidence beyond documents

1 pts
Evidence beyond documents · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1Describe at least one specific historical example beyond the supplied documents and explain how it supports the argument. This must be different from the evidence used for contextualization.

Examples earning credit

Shays’ Rebellion helped expose disputes over state authority and public order, supporting an explanation for the stronger federal framework.

The Massachusetts constitution of 1780 and subsequent judicial decisions concerning slavery illustrate one state-level route from rights language toward change.

Common non-credit examples

Mention slavery generally without a specific example beyond the documents.

Sourcing

1 pts
Sourcing · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1For at least two documents, explain how or why the author’s point of view, purpose, historical situation, or audience matters to an argument. Identifying HIPP labels alone is insufficient.

Examples earning credit

Adams’ private appeal to a lawmaking husband shows a route for pressing reform despite women’s limited formal political power; Hall’s petition uses legislators’ revolutionary rights language to challenge continued bondage.

Common non-credit examples

Adams is a woman and the declaration is from 1776, with no explanation of their relevance.

Complex understanding

1 pts
Complex understanding · Point levels
0The required claim, evidence, or reasoning is absent or inaccurate.
1Demonstrate complex understanding through developed qualification, multiple perspectives, or meaningful connections. Alternative evidence routes include effectively supporting the argument with all seven documents; explaining how sourcing for at least four documents supports the argument; or combining documents and outside evidence to develop different perspectives. Any one valid route suffices. The complexity must be part of the argument; document counts or isolated phrases alone are insufficient.

Examples earning credit

Explain how popular consent both legitimized new national institutions and supplied excluded groups with claims against the institutions’ unequal rules. Connect these tensions across the essay.

Common non-credit examples

Add the sentence history is complex without developing a qualification or evidence-based connection.

Back to guide navigation ↑

LEQ · Long essay

One broad required prompt · 15%

6points

Choose relevant developments within the broad period. You do not need to cover every part of it.

Thesis 1Context 1Evidence 2Historical reasoning 1Complex understanding 1
LEQ scoring criteria
CriterionPtsWhat earns credit
Thesis1Answer the historical task with a defensible, reasoned claim.
Context1Explain a broader historical setting relevant to the task.
Evidence21: provide two relevant, specific examples. 2: use them to support an argument.
Historical reasoning1Structure the argument using comparison, causation, or continuity and change as appropriate.
Complex understanding1Develop nuance through argument or effective evidence, rather than a passing phrase.

Different valid paths · A political-participation task may support an argument about expanded white male suffrage or Black political participation during Reconstruction. Judge the chosen claim against the actual question, not a single model essay.

Question-specific example · 2027 adaptation · LEQ 1

Platform-original 2027 adaptation · Not official

This registered 2027 task and its specific rubric were created by AP Exam Kit. They are not official College Board exam content.

Thesis / claim · 论点

1 pts
Thesis / claim · 论点 · Point levels
0No defensible claim answering the task with a line of reasoning; merely repeating the task or naming a topic is insufficient.
1In the introduction or conclusion, state a defensible answer to this task and a reason or analytical structure for it. A focused subperiod is valid.

Examples earning credit

The widening of white male suffrage and the growth of mass parties made elections a more regular form of popular mobilization, while preserving racial and gender exclusions that limited this democratization.

Black political participation during Reconstruction helped turn emancipation into claims for public education and equal citizenship, but organized violence and weakened federal protection made these social changes contested rather than secure.

Common non-credit examples

These developments changed society a lot, with no explanation of what changed or why.

Contextualization · 背景

1 pts
Contextualization · 背景 · Point levels
0No relevant broader context is described; a date, isolated label or repetition of the introduction is insufficient.
1Describe broader events, developments or processes relevant to the task or chosen argument. Relevance may be clear from the discussion; no separate formulaic linking sentence or whole-period survey is required.

Examples earning credit

The Revolution challenged hereditary political authority, but the new republic initially left voting rules largely to states and excluded many residents. That gap between republican ideals and access to power shaped nineteenth-century politics.

Slavery denied enslaved people legal independence and helped slaveholders control southern political institutions. Emancipation and Union victory therefore opened a struggle over whether freedom would also include public power.

Common non-credit examples

Copying the task's introductory statement without adding a relevant historical explanation.

Evidence · 证据

2 pts
Evidence · 证据 · Point levels
0Fewer than two specific relevant historical examples, or examples are inaccurate or do not answer this task.
1Provide at least two specific historical examples relevant to this task and the chosen focus. Naming general themes alone is insufficient.
2Use at least two specific, relevant examples to support an argument answering this task; show how the examples support the claim. Accept defensible evidence beyond these examples.

Examples earning credit

During the early nineteenth century, many states removed property requirements for white male voters. This widened the electorate that party organizers had to reach, tying political competition to more households rather than only property-owning elites. The election of 1828 used rallies, newspapers, and local party networks to mobilize support for Andrew Jackson. Such organization helped turn political identification into a recurring feature of community life rather than an occasional elite consultation.

The Fifteenth Amendment prohibited denying the vote on grounds of race, color, or previous servitude. Black men used this new constitutional protection to vote and organize, changing who could claim a public voice in southern government. Reconstruction governments with Black elected officials expanded state support for public school systems in the South. Political representation thus affected access to education, showing a social consequence beyond the mere act of casting a ballot.

Common non-credit examples

A list of broad labels with no specific historical content; or using only events outside the task period as the supporting argument.

Analysis and reasoning · 分析与推理

2 pts
Analysis and reasoning · 分析与推理 · Point levels
0No historical reasoning structures an argument answering this task; chronological order or a slogan alone is insufficient.
1Structure an argument answering this task through causation, comparison, or continuity and change. Reasoning may be uneven; do not demand all three modes or a second movement.
2Demonstrate complex understanding through developed nuance, interacting causes or effects, explained similarities and differences, continuity and change, meaningful connections, or effective evidence supporting a nuanced argument. This must be part of the argument, not a passing phrase. No specific example list or mandatory counterargument is required.

Examples earning credit

Popular party politics did not make participation universal: women lacked voting rights in most places, and free Black men faced exclusion in many states. These limits help explain why petitioning and reform organizations remained important alongside elections; electoral expansion and unequal citizenship operated together.

White supremacist violence and the return of conservative control restricted these gains; the Mississippi constitution of 1890 used voting barriers to suppress Black participation. Yet suppression did not erase the constitutional amendments. Distinguishing constitutional change from practical access explains both Reconstruction's durable legacy and its reversals.

Common non-credit examples

Adding 'however, not everyone benefited' or listing four events without developing the relationship to the argument.

Scoring rules

Judge the submitted argument, not agreement with a model essay. The paths and evidence examples below are illustrative, not an exhaustive checklist.

Accept a well-supported focus on one or more relevant developments within the stated period. Do not require the whole time span, all introductory topics, two movements, or a prescribed focus.

Score the four rows independently, for 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 points. Context may fall before, during or after the period when relevant to the task; supporting evidence must answer the actual task. A missing thesis point does not automatically remove evidence or reasoning points.

Minor language or factual slips do not automatically invalidate an otherwise defensible argument. Do not supply missing evidence, rewrite a false claim into a true one, or credit a named event as explained support without a demonstrated link.

Two relevant pieces of evidence suffice for the evidence row's maximum when used to support the argument. Four pieces are one possible route to complex understanding only when they support a nuanced argument; four names alone do not earn complexity. Sophisticated reasoning or perspective analysis can also earn complexity without four examples.

The argument must connect political participation to effects on society, not merely list voting rules. Electoral, associational, petitioning or collective-action focuses can be valid; no particular identity group or whole-period survey is required.

This task addresses Political participation and society in 1754–1898. The examples illustrate two different choices of focus; neither focus nor their combined evidence is required.

Back to guide navigation ↑